this article is enough to know GraphQL
Hey superman! If you’re reading this, you’re probably wondering whether to make the jump from REST to GraphQL in your .NET applications. I’ve been working with both technologies for years, and I’m here to share everything I’ve learned — the good, the bad, and the ugly.
What We’ll Cover
- What exactly GraphQL is (in plain English)
- Setting up GraphQL in a .NET project (step-by-step)
- Real comparison with REST (with code)
- When to use (and when not to use) GraphQL
- Performance considerations that actually matter
- Migration strategy that won’t break your production
you can clap +50 if you really like an article… 👏
What is GraphQL, Really?
Understanding the Basics
GraphQL is a query language for APIs that lets client-side handle what they want. Unlike REST, where the server dictates what data you get from each endpoint, GraphQL enables the client to specify exactly what data it needs.
Think of it like ordering at a restaurant — instead of getting a fixed menu (REST), you can customize your order exactly how you want it (GraphQL).
The Type System
At its core, GraphQL is built on a strong type system. Every GraphQL service defines a set of types that completely describe the data you can query.
When you set up a GraphQL API, you start by defining these types:
- Object Types: Your main data models (like User, Order, Product)
- Scalar Types: Basic data types (String, Int, Boolean, etc.)
- Input Types: Special types for arguments in mutations
- Enums: Sets of allowed values
- Interfaces: Abstract types that others can implement
once you define these types, GraphQL enforces them automatically. You can’t ask for fields that don’t exist, and you’ll always get exactly what you expect.
Operation Types — GraphQL has three main operation types:
-
Queries: For fetching data (like GET in REST)
-
Can request multiple resources in a single query
-
Fields can be nested to any depth
-
Always idempotent (won’t change data)
- Mutations: For modifying data (like POST/PUT/DELETE in REST)
- Can perform multiple modifications in one request
- Return updated data in the response
- Execute sequentially (unlike queries)
- Subscriptions: For real-time updates
- Maintain an active connection with the server
- Receive updates when data changes
- Perfect for chat apps, live feeds, etc.
Let’s see this in action. Here’s a practical example
Comparing REST and GraphQL approaches:
1. REST way (multiple endpoints needed):
GET /api/users/123
GET /api/users/123/orders
GET /api/users/123/preferences
You’d need to make three separate requests and get all fields whether you need them or not. The responses might look like:
// First request: /api/users/123
{
"id": 123,
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"phoneNumber": "555-0123",
"address": "123 Main St",
"registerDate": "2024-01-01",
"lastLoginDate": "2024-03-15"
}
// Second request: /api/users/123/orders
{
"orders": [
{
"id": 1,
"date": "2024-03-01",
"total": 99.99,
"items": [...],
"shippingAddress": "...",
"billingAddress": "...",
"status": "delivered"
}
]
}
// Third request: /api/users/123/preferences
{
"preferences": {
"theme": "dark",
"emailNotifications": true,
"language": "en",
"timezone": "UTC-5"
}
}
2. GraphQL way (single request, only get what you need):
query {
user(id: 123) {
name
email
orders {
total
date
}
preferences {
theme
}
}
}
{
"data": {
"user": {
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"orders": [
{
"total": 99.99,
"date": "2024-03-01"
}
],
"preferences": {
"theme": "dark"
}
}
}
}
When a query comes in, GraphQL:
- Parses the query to understand what fields are requested
- Matches each field to its resolver
- Executes resolvers in parallel when possible
- Assembles the results into the exact shape requested
Resolvers are the backbone of GraphQL execution. They’re functions that know how to get the data for each field in your schema. Think of them as mini-endpoints, each responsible for one specific piece of data.
This is fundamentally different from REST, where each endpoint typically maps to a single controller action. In GraphQL, you might have dozens of resolvers working together to fulfill a single query.
*before your ****GO-TO ***& Best Practices Guide for implementation. I want you to look at the performance impact…
I ran some tests on a medium-sized application (~1.3M records). Here’s what I found:
0️⃣** Simple Single Resource Request:**
- REST: 45ms
- GraphQL: 48ms (GraphQL has a slight overhead on simple requests)
1️⃣ Complex Request with Related Data:
- REST (multiple endpoints): 320ms
- GraphQL (single request): 89ms (GraphQL shines here!)
2️⃣** Network Payload for User Profile:**
- REST: 24KB (full user object)
- GraphQL: 8KB (only requested fields)
When Should You NOT Use GraphQL?
Let’s be honest — it’s not always the right choice:
-
Simple CRUD Apps
-
If you’re just building a basic admin panel, REST might be simpler
- File Uploads
- While possible with GraphQL, it’s more complicated than REST
- Small Teams with Tight Deadlines
- Learning curve might not be worth it for very small projects
FINALLY!! Setting Up GraphQL in .NET — Step by Step
let’s understand the .NET GraphQL ecosystem
0️⃣Ecosystem:
HotChocolate is the most popular GraphQL server for .NET, and for good reason:
- Built specifically for .NET
- High performance
- Rich feature set
- Active community
- Regular updates
There are other options like GraphQL.NET, but Hot Chocolate has become the de facto standard due to its excellent integration with ASP.NET Core and comprehensive feature set.
📍 well go and search for Hasura too…
1️⃣Packages:
dotnet add package HotChocolate.AspNetCore
dotnet add package HotChocolate.Data
✓** **HotChocolate.AspNetCore :
- Provides ASP.NET Core integration
- Handles HTTP processing
- Manages GraphQL execution
- Offers schema configuration
✓ HotChocolate.Data: Adds data integration features
- Filtering capabilities
- Sorting support
- Pagination
- Entity Framework Core integration
Before setting up GraphQL types, you need your domain models. These should reflect your business entities
2️⃣Domain Model Design
public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public List Orders { get; set; }
}
public class Order
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public decimal Total { get; set; }
public DateTime OrderDate { get; set; }
public int UserId { get; set; }
public User User { get; set; }
}
The relationships between them (like User -> Orders) will be reflected in your GraphQL schema.
3️⃣Creating GraphQL Types
Once you have your models, you need to create corresponding GraphQL types. There are several approaches:
- Annotation-based (simplest):
public class Query
{
public async Task GetUser([Service] IUserRepository repository, int id)
{
return await repository.GetUserByIdAsync(id);
}
public async Task> GetUsers([Service] IUserRepository repository)
{
return await repository.GetUsersAsync();
}
}
2. Type-first (more control):
public class UserType : ObjectType
{
protected override void Configure(IObjectTypeDescriptor descriptor)
{
descriptor.Field(f => f.Id).Type>();
descriptor.Field(f => f.Name).Type>();
descriptor.Field(f => f.Email).Type>();
descriptor
.Field(f => f.Orders)
.ResolveWith(r => r.GetOrders(default!, default!))
.UseDbContext();
}
}
Advance GraphQL Practices
4️⃣Adding Real Features to Your GraphQL API
— Filtering
Filtering in GraphQL is fundamentally different from REST. Instead of passing query parameters or creating multiple endpoints, GraphQL allows clients to specify complex filter conditions right in the query. Hot Chocolate provides a powerful filtering system that:
- Automatically generates filter types based on your models
- Supports complex logical operations (AND, OR, NOT)
- Handles nested filtering across relationships
- Translates filters into efficient database queries
The filtering system works at two levels:
- Simple field-level filtering (equals, contains, greater than, etc.)
- Complex logical combinations of filters
— Sorting
Sorting in GraphQL can be more flexible than traditional REST approaches. Instead of limiting clients to predefined sorting options, GraphQL can:
- Sort by multiple fields simultaneously
- Support different directions for each field
- Handle nested sort conditions
- Combine sorting with other operations like filtering
—** Pagination**
GraphQL supports two main pagination approaches:
-
Offset-based Pagination:
-
Similar to SQL LIMIT/OFFSET
-
Good for static data
-
Simple to implement
-
Can be inefficient for large datasets
- Cursor-based Pagination:
- Uses unique cursors to track position
- Better for real-time data
- More efficient for large datasets
- Implements Relay specification
Here’s how to implement these features:
public class Query
{
[UsePaging(MaxPageSize = 50)]
[UseProjection]
[UseFiltering]
[UseSorting]
public IQueryable GetUsers([Service] IUserRepository repository)
{
return repository.GetUsers();
}
}
This enables queries like:
query {
users(
where: {
name: { contains: "John" }
AND: {
orders: { some: { total: { gt: 100 } } }
}
}
order: [
{ name: ASC }
{ email: DESC }
]
first: 10
after: "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjk="
) {
edges {
node {
name
email
orders {
total
orderDate
}
}
cursor
}
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
endCursor
}
}
}
you may have lot of question still mumbling in your mind.. but article length matter sometime but also I am open to respond each and every comment just go and type…
moving on….
Understanding and Solving the N+1 Query Problem
— What is the N+1 Problem?
The N+1 query problem is one of the most common performance issues in GraphQL applications. It occurs when:
- You fetch a list of items (1 query)
- For each item, you fetch related data (N queries)
For example, when loading users and their orders:
// This approach causes N+1 problems
public class UserType : ObjectType
{
protected override void Configure(IObjectTypeDescriptor descriptor)
{
descriptor
.Field(f => f.Orders)
.Resolve(async context =>
{
var user = context.Parent();
// 🚫 This makes a separate query for each user!
return await _orderRepository.GetOrdersForUserAsync(user.Id);
});
}
}
— DataLoader Pattern
DataLoader is a pattern that solves the N+1 problem by:
- Collecting all requested IDs during a single execution cycle
- Batching them into a single database query
- Distributing results back to the original requests
Types
Here’s a proper implementation:
public class OrdersByUserDataLoader : BatchDataLoader>
{
private readonly IOrderRepository _orderRepository;
public OrdersByUserDataLoader(
IOrderRepository orderRepository,
IBatchScheduler batchScheduler)
: base(batchScheduler)
{
_orderRepository = orderRepository;
}
protected override async Task>> LoadBatchAsync(
IReadOnlyList userIds,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
// Explanation: This makes ONE query for ALL users
var allOrders = await _orderRepository.GetOrdersByUserIdsAsync(userIds);
// Group orders by user ID for efficient distribution
return allOrders
.GroupBy(o => o.UserId)
.ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.ToList());
}
}
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services
.AddGraphQLServer()
.AddQueryType()
.AddDataLoader() // Register DataLoader
.AddProjections()
.AddFiltering()
.AddSorting();
}
there is lot more to cover.. Respond ‘+1’
In the next article, we will discuss
- Future Considerations (Federation, Edge Computing)
- Best Practices and Common Mistakes
- End Note and Next Steps…
This article is based on real-world experience implementing GraphQL in enterprise .NET applications. All code samples are tested and production-ready.